Force 4 Compassion - end human trafficking
Human Trafficking Hotline 1-888-3737-888

Force 4 Compassion Human Trafficking News: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Guidance for Project/Programme Managers

Evaluation Guidance for Project Managers


Programmes and projects need to be designed with evaluation in mind as evaluation is an essential part of their life cycle. See Evaluation in the Project/Programme Cycle

When formulating a new project/programme or a revision, the Programme Manager should: 1) Review prior evaluation results to inform the design; 2) Review evaluation plans to ensure coordination and coherence; 3) Carefully plan the timing of the evaluation; and, 4) Ensure sufficient funding (calculated with the Evaluation Budget Matrix). 

All evaluations are further guided by the principles of human rights, gender equality and leaving no one behind. See Human Rights and Gender Equality

Evaluation Handbook (Overall context of evaluation)


All programme and project documents and revisions thereof are required to include a tentative evaluation plan. IES reviews and clears such in the Direct Approval process and the UNODC Programme Review Committee (PRC). To avoid last minute changes, pre-consultation with IES is recommended.

There is a Template for the evaluation paragraph in the Project Document (English), (Spanish) and the Project Revision (English), (Spanish). Required details include: 1) Type of evaluation; 2) Quarter and year to initiate the evaluation; 3) Budget (calculated with the Evaluation Budget Matrix) 4) Use of evaluation results; 6) Prior evaluations; and, 7) whether a Cluster evaluation is planned. See Evaluation Cluster Guidelines 

Evaluation Handbook (Overall context of evaluation)


The responsibility for managing Independent Project Evaluations (IPEs) lies with the Manager of the programme/project being evaluated. An IPE is conducted by independent external evaluators. IES backstops the process, including reviewing and clearing all deliverables in the process, as well as provides quality assurance and guidance throughout the process.

An IPE is initiated 8 months prior to the planned date of completion of the project (final evaluation) or half way through the duration of the project (mid-term evaluation) by the Manager in the on-line evaluation management application Unite Evaluations. See Unite Evaluations User Manual for Programme Managers. See also Evaluation Step by Step

Evaluation Flowchart IPE 

Evaluation ToR Template 

Evaluation Inception Report Template

Evaluation Report Template IPE; Evaluation Brief Template IPE

Typographic StylesUN Spelling

Evaluation Handbook (Guide for project/programme managers and evaluators;  and Practical guide to carry out high quality evaluations)

See also Evaluation during COVID19 Crisis 


In-depth Evaluations (IDEs) are usually large-scale strategic evaluations of corporate-level initiatives, policies, approaches, country/regional/thematic or global programmes. An IDE is undertaken by independent external evaluators or specialized companies, is managed by IES and also involves staff from IES as part of the evaluation team. IES further initiates the IDE in the on-line evaluation management application Unite Evaluations.

IDEs usually require extensive consultation, take longer to complete, command significantly larger budgets, and the reports are shared with a wider audience. IDEs are initiated 10-12 months prior to the planned date of completion of the intervention. See also Evaluation Step by Step

Evaluation Flowchart IDE

Evaluation ToR Template 

Evaluation Inception Report Template

Evaluation Report Template IDE; Evaluation Brief Template IDE 

Typographic StylesUN Spelling 

Evaluation Handbook (Guide for project/programme managers and evaluators; and Practical guide to carry out high quality evaluations)

See also Evaluation during COVID-19 Crisis 


The evaluation process does not end with the final evaluation report. In the light of the evaluation recommendations, Programme/Project Managers discuss and liaise with relevant parties, including senior management, other UNODC sections, donors, etc. and and prepare a Management Response (MR). The MR is included in a table in the final evaluation report, indicating whether each recommendation is accepted/partially accepted or rejected, together with action to be taken to implement. For an IDE, a written narrative (approximately 1–2 pages) is further added to the final report. 

Managers are also responsible for the development of the Evaluation Follow-up Plan (EFP) on the implementation of the evaluation recommendations. The EFP is prepared  in the on-line evaluation management application Unite Evaluations and is reviewed and cleared by IES. See Guidance for the drafting and monitoring of the Follow-up Plan. The Manager is required to update the follow-up plan once a year. IES further reports on the implementation of recommendations to the Executive Director and Member States on an annual basis.

The evaluation report is further disseminated by Programme/Project Manager for learning and improved UNODC programming. IES shares evaluation results with Member States and UNODC's Executive Director, as well as publishes Evaluation Reports and Evaluation Briefs on its website. All UNODC Evaluation Reports further undergo an external quality assessment (Evaluation Quality Assessment Template). See the Evaluation Quality Assessment Report 2019 and the 2-page Summary.


Human Trafficking News
Human Trafficking Legislation
RSS Feed
Modern-day Slavery
What is Human Trafficking?
How We Help
Hotline 888-3737-888
Survivor Stories
Give & Volunteer
Give - F4C Store
Give - Bracelets
Give - Scarves
Volunteer - Dream Center
Volunteer - Arrow Ministries
Joel Osteen Ministries
Lakewood Church
Rescue & Restore
Fashion 4 Compassion
New Orleans Mission
Harris County Sheriff's Office
Arrow Ministries
Freedom Place

Copyright © 2010-2021 Force 4 Compassion, a division of Fashion 4 Compassion, Inc. - a 501c3 non-profit organization | 317 Ranch Road 620 S | Suite 202 | Austin, Texas 78734